
The UK’s public and private residential property sector
currently faces a number of significant challenges...
1) Supply
The UK residential property sector is facing
an uphill struggle out of the doldrums. Although Oxford Economics
reports that there has been a tentative recovery in new housing
starts over the past twelve months, with total private residential
starts in England rising to 23,470 in the first quarter of the year
(up from 20,360 in 2010Q1 and around 15,000 year earlier), this is
still well short of the rates of house building in previous years
when around 35,000-40,000 homes were started on average per
quarter.
Capita Symonds has the skills to optimise the
value and development potential of sites to increase the commercial
viability of sites. This includes securing the right planning
consent and obtaining the best price for construction.
2) Demand
Assuming a continued decline in the number of
persons in each household (thanks to increasing longevity and
higher divorce rates) the number of households is expected to rise
by around 2.5m from 2011 to 2020. This means less available
housing, especially for those starting on the property ladder. For
example, by 2033, 19 per cent of the household population of
England is projected to live alone, compared with 14 per cent in
2008.
We can’t change the economy or lenders’
policies. We can, however, ensure that homes are well designed and
finished to maximise their attractiveness to buyers.
3) Prices
The implication of the continuing shortfall
between the rate of household formation and the supply of homes
will continue to exert an upward pressure on house prices. This
will further restrict the ability of first time buyers to access
the housing market. The implication is that existing owners will
find it harder to sell their homes to trade up. It is suggested
that much of the activity in the mortgage market is existing
occupiers remortgaging to take advantage if historically low rates
and invest in improvements to their existing home rather than
moving.
By securing a consent that optimises the
development capacity of a site and getting the right price for
construction of a well designed, finished and presented product we
can deliver projects that maximise the gap between development cost
and value, making prices competitive.
4) Rents
This has put an intense pressure on private
rented homes driving up rents rapidly in areas where there is a
demand for homes, especially in London and the South East. A 4%
year-on-year increase is expected across the country with higher
rates of increase in high demand areas.
We believe that there is an opportunity to
create a professionally managed private rented sector in the UK.
Our skills in property management, maintenance and development give
us confidence this can be done and are working towards delivering
this.
5) Social Housing
In April 2012 the Housing Revenue Account held
by each local housing authority will be changed. In essence each
local authority that own houses will become an independent asset
management body. This is having a number of consequences as
councils look very closely at how they can use their housing assets
most effectively to meet local needs. Amongst the consequences is
the planned demolition of homes which are costly to maintain and
manage. The introduction of a revised Right to Buy programme may
also reduce the number of homes available for new households. Other
initiatives such as those to reduce under occupation or bring empty
homes back into use may, however, increase supply.
We are developing homes for social and
affordable rent across the country. We can provide tested solutions
to developing complex sites and delivering homes within strict
budgets. With an established supply chain and working practices we
can deliver projects quickly to take advantage of windfall
opportunities.
6) Planning Policy
The Coalition Government has set out radical
proposals for overhauling the planning process through the National
Planning Policy Framework which reduces and condenses the guidance
on making planning applications and includes a presumption in
favour of sustainable development and developments promoting
economic growth. In parallel with this the Localism Bill promises
greater control over planning decisions at local level through
neighbourhood plans.
These changes have been broadly supported by
the development industry whilst conservation groups argue that the
presumption in favour of development reduces the protection
afforded to Green Belt and other open spaces.
It is unarguable that the current planning
process with massive reports and extensive consultation processes
represents a burden on developers whilst not necessarily
guaranteeing the outcomes which communities seek in terms of design
quality or the nature of developments.
Whether the drive for clarity and simplicity
will achieve the outcomes sought or whether the absence of detailed
guidance will increase the scope for interpretation and therefore
increase the risk of legal challenges to planning decisions is yet
to be seen. It is too early to judge whether this will increase
markedly the construction of new homes.
Whatever the outcome of the consultation on
the NPPF we will have a clear grasp of the issues and the ability
to apply them to projects creatively to deliver value to
clients.